Build + Trust, In One Workflow
Secure AI Agent Development Company
We build production AI agents — and harden them before they get tool access. Security is part of the build, not a bolt-on audit after a breach. Super Cat is the rare practitioner who both ships agents and secures them.
“Ship fast, harden later” is now a documented ransomware vector. In 2026, JadePuffer used an AI agent to do recon, steal credentials, and encrypt files with no human in the loop — and 78% of organizations reported an AI-related security incident (DigiCert). The autonomy that makes an agent useful makes an unhardened one dangerous.
Expert-Vetted top 1% · 100% JSS · production AI at a 5,000-employee US enterprise + a Big 4 firm
The Wedge
Build Agents AND Harden Them
The market splits into builders who never say “secure” and security firms that don’t build. Super Cat sits in the gap: security enters at design, not after a breach.
We build the agent
Production AI agents — LLM/RAG systems, tool-using autonomous workflows — shipped and running inside real companies, not demos.
And we harden it
Security requirements shape the architecture from the first design session. The agent is safe by the time it ships, not reviewed after it’s live.
Before tool access
The dangerous moment is when an agent first gets credentials and the ability to act. We gate that moment behind a hardening checklist, every time.
One accountable partner
Not a build agency that never says “secure” plus an AppSec firm that can’t build. One practitioner owns both — no dropped hand-off.
Before Any Agent Gets Tool Access
The Pre-Tool-Access Hardening Checklist
The six checks we run before an agent touches a credential or a production system. It doubles as an AI agent security audit for an agent you already have live.
1 · Least-privilege tool scoping
Every tool and credential the agent can reach is scoped to the minimum it needs. No standing access to anything it doesn’t use in the happy path.
2 · Human-in-the-loop gates
Destructive, irreversible or high-spend actions require explicit approval. The agent proposes; a human confirms before it touches production.
3 · Treat all input as untrusted
Model output and retrieved content are hostile until proven otherwise — prompt-injection and tool-poisoning defenses on every input path.
4 · Execution isolation
The agent runs in a sandboxed environment so a compromise can’t pivot into the rest of your infrastructure.
5 · Egress + spend controls
Rate limits, spend caps and egress filtering so a hijacked agent can’t exfiltrate data or run up unbounded cost.
6 · Full audit logging
Every tool call, input and decision is logged and monitored for anomalous behavior — you can answer “what did the agent do?” after the fact.
Running an agent in production already? We'll audit it against this checklist first — harden in place, or rebuild secure.
The Difference
A Builder Who Hardens
A builder who hardens knows exactly which tool the agent shouldn't have and why — because they wrote the integration. Here you get a named, Expert-Vetted top-1% data scientist with a 100% Job Success Score, production AI shipped at a 5,000-employee US enterprise and a Big 4 firm, and a live AI product (Super Chain), a private on-premise AI platform where security isn't optional. Production-grade agent engineering isn't a nice-to-have anymore — after JadePuffer it's a security requirement.
Need the engineer embedded to build it? The same firm deploys forward-deployed AI engineers — one accountable partner for the build and the hardening.
FAQ
Secure AI Agent Development, Answered
How do you secure an AI agent in production?
Security enters at design, not after a breach. Before an agent gets tool access we run a pre-tool-access hardening pass: scope every tool and credential to least privilege, gate destructive or irreversible actions behind human-in-the-loop approval, isolate the agent’s execution environment, treat all model output and retrieved content as untrusted (prompt-injection and tool-poisoning defense), and instrument full audit logging of every tool call. In production we add rate and spend limits, egress controls so a compromised agent can’t exfiltrate data, and continuous monitoring for anomalous tool use. The agent is hardened before it can touch anything that matters — not audited after it already has.
What is agentic AI ransomware?
Agentic AI ransomware is an attack where an autonomous AI agent — not a human operator — carries out the intrusion end to end: reconnaissance, credential theft, lateral movement, and file encryption, with no human in the loop. The JadePuffer case in 2026 was the documented proof that this is real, not hypothetical: an AI agent did the recon, stole credentials, and encrypted files on its own. It reframes “ship fast, harden later” agent builds from a code-quality issue into a live ransomware vector — the same autonomy that makes an agent useful makes an unhardened one dangerous.
Do you audit an existing agent before rebuilding it?
Yes — an agent security audit is often the entry point. Before touching the build we assess what tools and credentials the agent can reach, where its inputs come from, what it can do without approval, and what it logs. You get a prioritized findings report against the pre-tool-access checklist and a clear call: harden in place, or rebuild secure. Many engagements start as an audit and become a rebuild once the blast radius of the current agent is on the table.
Isn’t security a separate audit after the agent is built?
That’s exactly the model that produced JadePuffer-class exposure. Bolting security on after an agent already has tool access means auditing a system that can already do damage. We build and harden as one workflow — the security requirements shape the architecture, tool scoping and approval gates from the first design session, so the agent is safe by the time it ships rather than reviewed after it’s live.
Why hire a builder who also does security instead of two vendors?
The market splits into agent-build agencies that never say “secure” and AppSec firms that don’t build agents — and the gap between them is where breaches live. A builder who hardens knows exactly which tool the agent shouldn’t have and why, because they wrote the tool integration. One accountable practitioner for the build and the trust means security isn’t a hand-off that gets dropped.
Threat context: 2026 reporting on the JadePuffer autonomous-agent ransomware case (SecurityWeek, eSecurityPlanet, Adversa) and DigiCert's finding that 78% of organizations had an AI-related security incident. Cited as reported industry figures.
Build the agent secure — or audit the one you have.
Tell us what your agent needs to do. We'll harden it before it gets tool access — or audit a live one against the checklist above.